Japan’s Uncertain Future in Financing Overseas Coal Power Plants


Japan’s Uncertain Future in Financing Overseas Coal Power Plants

12 April 2021 – by Ankush Kumar   Comments (0)

Although Japan has announced to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, the world’s fifth-highest carbon emitter continues its coal investments. Acknowledging the potential of green energy for economic growth, the island nation aims to generate around 50% electricity from renewables, 10% from hydrogen and ammonia, and further up to 40% from nuclear and thermal power plants.

However, Japan still largely relies on imported fossil fuel. In 2019, it accounted for 88% of the total primary energy supply, a newly released report of the International Energy Agency (IEA) states. This was the sixth-highest share among IEA member countries. Moreover, the country also invests heavily through its banks, financial institutions, and insurance companies in overseas coal-based power plants.

Financing by G20 countries for coal and renewable energy projects abroad graph
Source: IEA

Unraveled fossil fuel diplomacy

Globally after the US, Japan’s investors are the second biggest lenders to the fossil fuel industry, a collaborative research report published this February by the German non-governmental organization Urgewald and 28 further partners found.

Japan’s institutional coal investments sum up to USD $81 billion. The Government Pension Investment Fund alone holds bonds and shares of USD $29 billion in companies listed on the GCEL.

Japans total energy consumption 2019 pie chart

According to the study, 381 commercial banks have provided loans totalling USD $315 billion to the coal industry over the past two years. The top three lenders are the Japanese banks Mizuho (USD $22 billion), Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (USD $21 billion) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (USD $18 billion). The 4th and 5th largest lenders are Citigroup (USD $13.5 billion) and Barclays (USD $13.4 billion).

Japanese investors justify coal investments

“The coal policies adopted by Japanese banks are among the weakest in the world”, said Eri Watanabe from 350.org Japan, which supported the Urgewald study. “They only cover a small portion of banks’ lending and do not rule out corporate loans or underwriting for companies that are still building new coal plants in Japan, Vietnam, the Philippines, and elsewhere.”

However, the Mizuho bank rebuffed the report. The figures used by the NGOs did “not reflect the reality” and were “inaccurate and inappropriate”, it stated. At the same time, it admitted to channeling funds to coal-based power projects: “Mizuho does not provide financing or investment for new construction of coal-fired power generation facilities or for coal mining projects employing the mountain top removal method.”

Likewise, even the Japanese insurance companies in their policies present themselves as the promoter of green energy and claim to support sustainability for climate change. However, the research and advocacy NGO Japan Center for a Sustainable Environment and Society (JCSES) said that it is inevitable to strengthen these policies, as they all include a wide range of exceptions.

“In principle, we will not provide insurance for, nor make investments in new coal-fired power plants,” the Japanese insurance MS&AD stated in September 2020 shortly after the government started its dialogue on the 2050 climate neutrality. They however would do so “after prudent consideration” where such utilities “are essential for the stable supply of energy to the country concerned”.

Similarly, the two competitors SOMPO Holdings (SOMPO) and Tokio Marine Holdings (Tokio Marine) declared their commitment to reduce or eliminate greenhouse gas emissions. Voicing against these exceptions, the JCSES activists urge these insurance conglomerates to withdraw from their coal engagements. Also, they ask to restrict their fossil fuel investments in other industries.

No bright future for coal-fired power plants

While countries across the world are shifting quickly towards clean energy, Japan largest banks are engaged with some of the biggest coal power plants projects in Bangladesh, Vietnam, Indonesia and other parts of Asia.

Japan invests in new coal fired power plants overseas

The Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) has earlier signed a loan agreement with the Vietnamese thermal power company VAPCO to build Vung Ang 2 coal-fired power plant. It pledged to co-finance the 1,200-megawatt project with approximately USD $636 million. The other large-scale project financed by Japanese banks is Bangladesh’s 1200-megawatt Matarbari power plant, which has seen USD $6.8 billion investments from the island country. However, it may not see its commissioning by 2026 as the project “is likely to be scrapped”, according to Bangladesh’s Daily Sun. The newspaper reported that the country was looking to cancel planned coal-fired power plants with a total capacity of 7,461 megawatts.

Japan’s coal investment must shift to renewable energy

In 2019, Greenpeace not only raised serious questions over Japan’s coal investments but also about the cheap and insecure infrastructure of the installed utilities. The report spoke of “a deadly double standard”. Accordingly, Japan financed coal-fired power plants abroad “that create air pollution at levels that would not be accepted in its own country”. Most of these projects employed emission control techniques far inferior to those required at home. 

Health impacts by Japanese funded coal plants graph
Source: Greenpeace

As the effects of climate change are getting more visible to the world, many countries have started looking at renewable energies such as solar, wind, hydro and bio-gas. Not only are these energy sources more viable in the long run but adopting them is directly related to the health and safety of the citizens. With many countries announcing to scrap their proposed coal-fired power plants, it is more logical for Japanese financial institutions to support clean energy projects.

Coal policies adopted by Japanese banks are among the weakest in the world graphic

by Ankush Kumar

Ankush Kumar is a Berlin-based freelance journalist who writes on energy transition, human rights, and enterprise technologies. He was formerly associated with India’s largest media conglomerate The Times Group, covering power utilities, coal, and renewable energy. Kumar was part of the Clean Energy Wire media study tour in 2018 to cover Germany’s coal phase-out.

As a journalist, Kumar was also involved in a cross-border story on lead-acid poisoning caused by battery recycling. The story won the prestigious “Ernst-Schneider-Preis” of the German Chamber of Commerce and Trade as well as the “Deutscher Journalistenpreis – djp” of The Early Editors Club in 2019. On April 22nd, 2021, at the Second Annual Fetisov Journalism Awards his co-authored story won the 2nd prize in the category of “Contribution to Civil Rights.” Over the years he has written articles for The Caravan, Financial Express, The Economic Times, Der Spiegel, Frankfurter Rundschau, and other reputed publications.

Read more

Related Articles

See all
G7 Ministerial Meetings 2024 – Outcomes
The Role of Coal in Asia
Renewable Energy in Singapore: Sources, Plan and Strategy
The LNG Outlook of the Philippines and Its Impact on the Country’s Future

Most Popular

See all
Renewable Energy in the Philippines – Current State and Future Roadmap
Natural Gas in Bangladesh – Record High Prices and Imminent Climate Impacts
The Growth of Renewable Energy in Indonesia 2022 – Current State, Opportunities and Challenges
Hydrogen Oil: Green vs Blue, What’s the Difference?

Energy Tracker Asia Newsletter

Become a subscriber of our newsletter and get the latest news on investments in coal, gas, and renewable energy in the region.

  • By clicking Sign Up, you consent to receive emails from Energy Tracker Asia. We won’t distribute your email address to any third party at any time. If you are under 16 years of age, please get consent from your parents or guardian first. You can unsubscribe any time. View our Privacy Policy.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.